Case Study

Harietta is 78 years old and has vascular dementia. She came to Olive Tree House from hospital where she had been admitted after attempts to support her to remain in her own home were unsuccessful due to her failing memory, disorientation, and lack of understanding of risks. These problems caused her to neglect herself and frequently leave her own home and get lost, often in the middle of the night. One of the things that made her particularly vulnerable was her tendency to talk to complete strangers, telling them that she lived alone and where her home was. When Harietta arrived at Olive Tree House she was very frightened and angry and did not understand why she was not able to remain in the flat that she had lived in for over 20 years; she was suspicious of everyone, believing that they were all in some way to blame for what was happening to her. Staff started to gather as much information as they could about Harietta’s life history and significant events. They were given useful information by neighbours, a friend of many years, and Harietta’s GP who had known her for over 20 years. 1.   Do you believe it was right for Harietta to be taken into care even though she did not want to be?  2.  What legislation would back up your argument? 3.  What were the risks to Harietta when she was living alone? 4.  Why is it essential to be in close contact with Harietta’s GP and neighbours? 5.  Why is it acceptable for staff to make certain decisions on Harietta’s behalf and not others? It is rare that there is just one way to respond to a scenario or situation, so do not consider that the response you have chosen to this scenario will be judged as right or wrong. Share your scenario with a work colleague and ask them to tell you if they think you have responded appropriately. Ask them to challenge your response if necessary. You do not need to submit this task for assessment unless asked to do so by your tutor.